 |
Evaluation of the Project PROVISO 2003-2007 |
|
| Year: |
2006 |
| Title: |
Evaluation of the Project PROVISO 2003-2007 |
| Client: |
Austrian Federal Ministry for Education, Science and Culture (bm:bwk) |
| Evaluator: |
Sonja Sheikh (KMU Forschung Austria) |
| Contents: |
The evaluation of the project PROVISO was carried out by the Austrian Institute for SME Research on behalf of the Federal Ministry for Education, Science and Culture (bm:bwk) from April to October 2006. The Austrian Institute for SME Research used a mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods for the evaluation. For this purpose, a document analysis, as well as a partly standardized written survey with a total of 66 users of the service and 31 qualitative interviews with PROVISO employees and other stakeholders of the service, and an international comparison with the help of four smaller case studies, has been accomplished. |
| Language: |
German |
| Pdf: |
proviso |
 |
Ex-post Evaluation of the special FFF programme "Austrian Food Initiative" |
|
| Year: |
2005 |
| Title: |
Ex-post Evaluation of the special FFF programme "Austrian Food Initiative" |
| Client: |
Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) |
| Evaluator: |
KMFA: Georg Bornett, Sonja Sheikh; B. Mehlmauer-Larcher, R. Kastner |
| Contents: |
In 1998, the Austrian Research Promotion Agency Ltd. (FFG) – department base programmes started the special programme “Austrian Food Initiative“. Its aim was to improve the competitiveness and to increase the technological potential of the Austrian food industry. R&D projects along the entire value-added chain, aiming at an increase of the technological potential of the enterprises, were supported. The initiative focussed, particularly in the second phase, on projects of SMEs and on co-operation projects.
In 2000, the KMFA conducted an interim evaluation of the Austrian Food initiative in collaboration with Prof. Czedik-Eysenberg and Dr. Robien-Jedlicka. In the course of this evaluation and based on the set targets and goals, output, success and effect indicators were derived for the assessment of the programme as a whole and also for the various individual projects. This first evaluation of the initiative for the initial phase showed – according to these indicators – that the initiative could be considered a big success, and it was consequently recommended to extend its running time.
|
| Language: |
German |
| Pdf: |
Food_initiative |
 |
Evaluation of the Discussion Forum 2004 “Genomics Research and Medicine“ –What’s MY advantage? |
|
| Year: |
2004 |
| Title: |
Evaluation of the Discussion Forum 2004 “Genomics Research and Medicine“ –What’s MY advantage? |
| Client: |
Federal Ministry for Education, Science and Culture (bm:bwk) |
| Evaluator: |
Stiftung Risiko-Dialog, St. Gallen: C. Meili, A. Hellmann-Grobe; N. Luchsinger |
| Contents: |
As an accompanying measure of the GEN-AU Programme, every year a discussion forum takes place which should give the general public the possibility to put questions and get information about the chances and risks of the genomics research. The evaluation of the discussion forum 2004, with the theme “Genomics Research and Medicine”, had the mission to investigate the motivations of the participants, to asses the organisation and the special sessions of the discussion forum and to give recommendations for concept- restructuring and reorganisation. |
| Language: |
German |
| Pdf: |
diskurstag04 |
 |
INTAS Evaluation – External Evaluation Report on the Programme of the International Association for the Promotion of Cooperation with Scientists from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (INTAS) Covering the Period 1993 - 2003 |
|
| Year: |
2004 |
| Title: |
INTAS Evaluation – External Evaluation Report on the Programme of the International Association for the Promotion of Cooperation with Scientists from the New Independent States of the Former Soviet Union (INTAS) Covering the Period 1993 - 2003 |
| Client: |
INTAS |
| Evaluator: |
Peter Idenburg, Per Stalnacke, Klaus Schuch (ZSI), Lajos Nyiri, Oleg Ventskonvsky, Marie-Hélène Mandrillon, Alexander Sokolov,
Henning Eikenberg, Olav Jull Sorensen |
| Contents: |
INTAS is an European Community Programme funded primarily under the European Framework Programmes for RTD. It comprises 33 members, i.e. the EC and 32 countries. In the period under review 55 calls for proposals were launched and 8 different funding instruments were operated between 1993 and 2003. INTAS has funded 2,726 projects, bringing together some 50,000 participants in 15,000 research teams. |
| Language: |
English |
| Pdf: |
intas_eval |
 |
Five-year Assessment of the European Union Research Framework Programmes 1999-2003 |
|
| Year: |
2004 |
| Title: |
Five-year Assessment of the European Union Research Framework Programmes 1999-2003 |
| Client: |
Atlantis Research, Athens (EU-Commission) |
| Evaluator: |
Wise Guys Ltd.: Ken Guy, Joanneum Research: Wolfgang Polt, Gerhard Streicher, GWU:
Nick Vonortas, Atlantis Research: Effie Amanatidou, Foteini Psarra |
| Contents: |
As a part of the Five Years Assessment of EU Research Activities covered by the Fifth Framework Programme for RTD (1999-2003), a survey was carried out among the 12000 participants to assess the additionality and impacts of the programme regarding type of activity, behaviour, output and performance. |
| Language: |
English |
| Pdf: |
5-year_assess |
 |
Participatory Policy-Consulting – The Case of the Citizen-Conference 2003 |
|
| Year: |
2004 |
| Title: |
Participatory Policy-Consulting – The Case of the Citizen-Conference 2003 |
| Client: |
Austrian Council for Research and Technology Development |
| Evaluator: |
Alexander Bogner (ITA), Harald Puchrucker, René Zimmer |
| Contents: |
The Austrian Citizen’s Conference "Genetic data, from where, whereto, what for?” was arranged by the PR agency communication matters from 20 to 23 June 2003 in Vienna. It was part of the Public Awareness Campaign on behalf of the Austrian Council for Research and Technology Development on the subject matter of innovation. Despite some delays and economic shortages, evidence was provided that this participative procedure can also be carried out in Austria. The institutional context of this project has proven dissatisfactory since potential actors certify the Austrian Citizen’s Conference as lacking credibility. But the organizers have resolved reservations with presenting a concrete form of procedure. As for the scientific counseling, a team of nature- and social scientists has been called in. However, no clear objective has yet been developed for this Citizen’s Conference. The procedure has especially been carried out from the pragmatic aspect of a smooth development. |
| Language: |
German |
| Pdf: |
policy_consult |
 |
Evaluation of the ScienceWeek@Austria 2002: Analysis of Science Communication Experiment within the Austrian Context |
|
| Year: |
2002 |
| Title: |
Evaluation of the ScienceWeek@Austria 2002: Analysis of Science Communication Experiment within the Austrian Context |
| Client: |
Federal Ministry for Education, Science and Culture (bm:bwk), Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (bmvit) |
| Evaluator: |
Institut für Wissenschaftstheorie und –forschung, Universität Wien: U. Felt, S. Schober, A. Müller |
| Contents: |
This report contains the evaluation of the ScienceWeek@Austria 2002 which aims at an improvement and a further development of the event. The strengths and weaknesses of the ScienceWeek are assessed and a comparison to the results of the last evaluation is given. |
| Language: |
German |
| Pdf: |
scienceweek_2002 |
 |
Evaluation of the ScienceWeek@Austria 2001: Analysis of Science Communication Experiment within the Austrian Context |
|
| Year: |
2001 |
| Title: |
Evaluation of the ScienceWeek@Austria 2001: Analysis of Science Communication Experiment within the Austrian Context |
| Client: |
Federal Ministry for Education, Science and Culture (bm:bwk), Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (bmvit) |
| Evaluator: |
Institut für Wissenschaftstheorie und –forschung, Universität Wien: U. Felt, S. Schober, A. Müller |
| Contents: |
The report focuses on a qualitative evaluation of the ScienceWeek@Austria 2001. The evaluation team tried to design a broad concept in order to catch unintended as well as unpredictable impressions of the event. |
| Language: |
German |
| Pdf: |
scienceweek_2001 |
 |
Evaluation of ITF-Programme FlexCIM |
|
| Year: |
2000 |
| Title: |
Evaluation of ITF-Programme FlexCIM |
| Client: |
Federal Ministry of Science and Transport |
| Evaluator: |
A. Geyer, C. Rammer, W. Pointner, W. Polt, H. Hollenstein, L. Donzé, S. Arvanitis |
| Contents: |
This evaluation assesses the impact of the FlexCIM programme, which used to be one of the most important programmes of the ITF- technology and innovation funds in the nineties.
The evaluation was accomplished by the Austrian Research Center Seibersdorf (ARCS) in cooperation with the Institute for technology and regional policy (INTEREG) of Joanneum Research, the Center for European Economic Research (ZEW) and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH).
|
| Language: |
German |
| Pdf: |
FlexCIM |
 |
Evaluation of the Austrian Participation in Community RTD Programmes – Final Report |
|
| Year: |
1997 |
| Title: |
Evaluation of the Austrian Participation in Community RTD Programmes – Final Report |
| Client: |
Federal Ministry of Science, Transport and the Arts, Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs |
| Evaluator: |
Fritz Ohler, Leonhard Jörg, Wolfgang Polt, Martin Husz, Anton Sieber (ARC), Ken Guy (Technopolis UK), Gernot Hutschenreiter, Sonja Patsios (WIFO), Herbert Gluske (University of Vienna) |
| Contents: |
- |
| Language: |
English |
| Pdf: |
EU_RTD-Progr |